Models and Optimal Designs for Conjoint Choice Experiments Including a No-Choice Option
By Bart Vermeulen, Peter Goos, Martina Vandebroek. 2008
111 citations recorded by the source corpus.
In a classical conjoint choice experiment, respondents choose one profile from each choice set that has to be evaluated. However, in real life, the respondent does not always make a choice: often he/she does not prefer any of the options offered. Therefore, including a no-choice option in a choice set makes a conjoint choice experiment more realistic. In the literature, three different models are used to analyze the results of a conjoint choice experiment with a no-choice option: the no-choice multinomial logit model, the extended no-choice multinomial logit model, and the nested no-choice multinomial logit model. We develop optimal designs for the two most appealing of these models using the D-optimality criterion and the modified Fedorov algorithm and compare these optimal designs with a reference design, which is constructed while ignoring the no-choice option, in terms of estimation and prediction accuracy. We conclude that taking into account the no-choice option when designing a no-choice experiment only has a marginal effect on the estimation and prediction accuracy as long as the model used for estimation matches the data-generating model.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, General Decision Sciences, Marketing
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1bf1a41fbd5776566043d4b77656657b05fd342f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
In Marketing
Citations in the corpus
- Factors Influencing Willingness-to-Pay for the Energy Star Label (2010, background): “ASC takes a value of 1 if the “none” option is chosen and 0 if one of the three alternatives is chosen (Vermeulen et al., 2008).”