Taking capitalism seriously: Toward an institutionalist approach to contemporary political economy

192 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A variety of capitalism … with Chinese characteristics? (2013, background): “The principal critiques of the VoC approach have emphasized the limitations following from its near-exclusive focus on nationally scaled formal institutions and economic dynamics, the object of what some consider to be a quasi-functionalist gaze; its relatively rigid conceptions of cross-sectional d”
International corporate governance: A review and opportunities for future research (2019, unknown): “…& Shin, 2014; Ellis, Moeller, Schlingemann, & Stulz, 2017; Filatotchev, Poulsen, & Bell, 2018; Qi, Roth, & Wald, 2017), legal studies (Cioffi, 2000; Licht, 2003; Roe, 2003), political economy (Bulfone, 2016; Landini & Pagano, 2018; Streeck, 2010) and CSR (Aguilera, Williams, Conley, & Rupp, 2006).”
The Political Economy of the Euro Crisis (2016, result): “…argument and empirical findings are consistent with classical models of social conflict in times of economic stress (e.g., Alesina & Drazen, 1991), but stand in contrast to theories that see an undermining impact of EU integration on European welfare states (e.g., , 2011a; Streeck, 2011b).”
From performativity to political economy: index investing, ETFs and asset manager capitalism (2016, background): “If ‘contemporary political economy… treats the economy as a black box’ (Streeck 2011: 138), the performativity literature has peeked under the lid while leaving the box mostly intact.”