Proving the Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Pruning is All You Need

By Eran Malach, Gilad Yehudai, Shai Shalev-Shwartz, Ohad Shamir. 2020

335 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The lottery ticket hypothesis (Frankle and Carbin, 2018), states that a randomly-initialized network contains a small subnetwork such that, when trained in isolation, can compete with the performance of the original network. We prove an even stronger hypothesis (as was also conjectured in Ramanujan et al., 2019), showing that for every bounded distribution and every target network with bounded weights, a sufficiently over-parameterized neural network with random weights contains a subnetwork with roughly the same accuracy as the target network, without any further training.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Materials Chemistry, Evaluation & Benchmarks

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Zhe Gan
  2. Jingjing Liu
  3. Yu Cheng
  4. Linjie Li
  5. Jianfeng Gao
  6. Mohit Bansal
  7. Yen-Chun Chen
  8. Furu Wei

In Materials Chemistry

  1. Simon Lacoste-Julien
  2. Yoshua Bengio

In Evaluation & Benchmarks

  1. Zhe Gan
  2. Simon Lacoste-Julien
  3. Jose Gallego-Posada
  4. Yu Cheng
  5. Yoshua Bengio
  6. Christopher R'e
  7. Yen-Chun Chen
  8. Tri Dao

Citations in the corpus