Assessment of shame and guilt in a psychiatric sample: a comparison of two measures

By P. Averill, Gretchen J. Diefenbach, M. Stanley, J. K. Breckenridge, Beth Lusby. 2002

87 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1bc7e65c4d567b268adce65f2b77d3603e9bcce8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Jan-Erik Lönnqvist
2. M. Verkasalo

In Social Psychology

1. Jan-Erik Lönnqvist
2. M. Verkasalo
3. K. Helkama
4. Mia Silfver
5. Eva E. A. Skoe
6. Shalom H. Schwartz
7. Florencia M. Sortheix

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Jan-Erik Lönnqvist
2. M. Verkasalo
3. K. Helkama
4. Mia Silfver
5. Eva E. A. Skoe
6. Shalom H. Schwartz
7. Florencia M. Sortheix

Citations in the corpus

• The relation between value priorities and proneness to guilt, shame, and empathy (2008, methodology): “…the Test of Self-Conscious Affect (TOSCA), have shown that shame-proneness was related to several indices of poor psychological and interpersonal adjustment, for example low self-esteem, anxiety, depression, and psychoticism (Averill et al. 2002; Tangney and Dearing 2002; Tangney et al. 1995).”