Using objective physical activity measures with youth: how many days of monitoring are needed?
By Stewart G. Trost, R. Pate, Patty S. Freedson, James F. Sallis, W. Taylor. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 2000
1,190 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Physiology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1bbf141a36f6115d3adca244dd76130b05b8ce89
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
In Physiology
- Ulf Ekelund
- Mark S. Tremblay
- Diane Catellier
- R. McMurray
- Søren Brage
- Nick Wareham
- R. Steele
- T. Conway
In Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Citations in the corpus
- Standardizing and Optimizing the Use of Accelerometer Data for Free-Living Physical Activity Monitoring (2005, methodology): “Research suggests that 4 to 7 d of monitoring are required to obtain a reliable assessment of physical activity behavior.(12,25) Expectations that correlation coefficients might approach 1.”
- Characteristics of physical activities in daily life in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. (2005, background): “70 or greater, which is considered as acceptable to assess reliably a variable in a group of individuals (20).”
- Physical activity levels and patterns of 9- and 15-yr-old European children. (2004, background): “However, as 4 d of measurement has been shown to be representative of a full week’s activity (24), we believe our figures are a realistic estimation of the proportion of children who meet current recommendations.”
- Imputation of missing data when measuring physical activity by accelerometry. (2005, background): “Although the measurement protocols vary, most studies involve monitoring physical activity over several days to ensure reliable estimates of usual physical activity behavior and to account for potentially important differences in activity patterns on weekdays versus weekend days (19).”
- Assessment of physical activity in youth. (2008, background): “80 in young children, but between 8 and 9 days may be required for adolescents (112).”
- Defining accelerometer thresholds for activity intensities in adolescent girls. (2004, background): “Laboratory-based studies have compared accelerometers to energy expenditure during physical activity in adults (5,15,26,27) and children (17,22,23).”