Size structure, not metabolic scaling rules, determines fisheries reference points

By K. H. Andersen, J. Beyer. 2015

93 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1bb0d32e526a5b90555447a842e9524bafb554b0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Global and Planetary Change

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

A simple length-structured model based on life history ratios and incorporating size-dependent selectivity: application to spawning potential ratios for data-poor stocks (2016, background): “603 Life history theory suggests that M is likely to be higher for smaller, younger 604 individuals, and decrease with increasing size (Lorenzen 2000, Andersen and Beyer 2013).”
Modelling climate change impacts on marine fish populations: process-based integration of ocean warming, acidification and other environmental drivers (2016, background): “Behavioural, energy allocation and foraging processes can 518 connect individual processes in more detail (Andersen and Beyer, 2013), and functional 519 separation in interactions can be integrated by using coupled size spectra, as exemplified 520 for pelagic predators and benthic detritivores…”
A trait-based approach to ocean ecology (2018, background): “The fundamental trade-off associated with asymptotic size is related to survival to adulthood and investment in reproduction (Andersen and Beyer, 2015): maturation at a later but larger size increases the fecundity at maturation due to the larger size, but reduces the likelihood of surviving to matu”
Metabolic impacts of climate change on marine ecosystems: Implications for fish communities and fisheries (2018, background): “…energy input to growth (somatic and reproductive) of an185 individual fish is determined by the local primary production and ecosystem trophic186 transfer efficiency, to an upper limit that is the maximum rate at which a well-fed187 fish can grow (von Bertalanffy, 1949; Andersen and Beyer, 2015).”
Modeling What We Sample and Sampling What We Model: Challenges for Zooplankton Model Assessment (2017, methodology): “…as an alternative to more traditional taxonomy-based frameworks by simplifying the community structure through classifying individuals based on size as opposed to species identity (Figure 1C; Sheldon and Parsons, 1967; Sheldon et al., 1972; Andersen and Beyer, 2015; Andersen et al., 2016).”