H I Narrow Self-Absorption in Dark Clouds: Correlations with Molecular Gas and Implications for Cloud Evolution and Star Formation
By Di Li, Paul F. Goldsmith. 2002
170 citations recorded by the source corpus.
We present the results of a comparative study of H I narrow self-absorption (HINSA), OH, 13CO, and C18O in five dark clouds. We find that the HINSA generally follows the distribution of the emission of the carbon monoxide isotopologs and has a characteristic size close to that of 13CO. This confirms earlier work that determined that the HINSA is produced by cold H I that is well mixed with molecular gas in well-shielded regions. The OH and 13CO column densities are essentially uncorrelated for the sources other than L1544. Our observations indicate that the central number densities of H I are between 2 and 6 cm-3 and that the ratio of the hydrogen density to total proton density for these sources is (5-27) × 10-4. Using cloud temperatures and the density of atomic hydrogen, we set an upper limit to the cosmic-ray ionization rate of 10-16 s-1. We present a model for H I to H2 conversion in well-shielded regions that includes cosmic-ray destruction of H2 and formation of this species on grain surfaces. We include the effect of a distribution of grain sizes, and we find that for an MRN distribution, the rate of H2 formation is increased by a factor of 3.4 relative to that for a model with a single grain radius of 1700 Å. Comparison of observed and modeled fractional H I abundances indicates ages for these clouds, defined as the time since the initiation of H → H2 conversion, to be 106.5-107 yr. Several effects may make this time a lower limit, but the low values of n that we have determined make it certain that the timescale for evolution from a possibly less dense atomic phase to an almost entirely molecular phase must be a minimum of several million years. This clearly sets a lower limit to the overall timescale for the process of star formation and the lifetime of molecular clouds.
Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Atmospheric Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1b896a75613e94ebe119ae1092bd2cebab12b55b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Astronomy and Astrophysics
- Ralf Klessen
- Mark R. Krumholz
- Christoph Federrath
- S. Glover
- E. Ostriker
- P. Hopkins
- P. Hennebelle
- C. McKee
In Atmospheric Science
Citations in the corpus
- ENVIRONMENTAL DEPENDENCE OF THE KENNICUTT–SCHMIDT RELATION IN GALAXIES (2010, background): “…surface densities in nearby spirals from Wong & Blitz (2002b) and measurements of gas fractions along the lines of sight to individual stars for atomic (Goldsmith & Li 2005) and molecular gas in the Milky Way and Magellanic Clouds (Tumlinson et al. 2002; Gillmon et al. 2006; Wolfire et al. 2008).”
- MODELING MOLECULAR HYDROGEN AND STAR FORMATION IN COSMOLOGICAL SIMULATIONS (2008, background): “While the measurements of atomic hydrogen fraction in the mostly molecular gas are not numerous (Goldsmith & Li 2005; Leroy et al. 2007), they provide a useful constraint for our model (see also the Appendix) in the regime where the gas is mostly molecular (fH I ≪ 1).”
- Microscopic simulation of methanol and formaldehyde ice formation in cold dense cores (2009, methodology): “Goldsmith & Li (2005) showed observationally that the H-atom abundance is higher than 1 cm−3 and we therefore use a higher H abundance of 10 cm−3 for our high density case which will be discussed below.”
- The big problems in star formation: The star formation rate, stellar clustering, and the initial mass function (2014, background): “Moreover, the results appear on their surface to contradict observations showing that clouds on such small scales do have close-to-equilibrium H i to H2 ratios (Goldsmith & Li 2005; Lee et al. 2012).”
- A WIDE-FIELD HIGH-RESOLUTION H i MOSAIC OF MESSIER 31. I. OPAQUE ATOMIC GAS AND STAR FORMATION RATE DENSITY (2009, background): “Goldsmith & Li (2005)), while the majority have no apparent CO counterparts (Gibson et al. 2000).”
- Theory of Star Formation (2007, background): “…of molecule formation in a turbulent (and therefore clumpy) medium, Glover & Mac Low (2007) find that H2 formation is indeed accelerated when compared with the non-turbulent case, although the atomic fractions they found are substantially greater than those observed by Goldsmith & Li (2005).”
- Ultraviolet Survey of CO and H2 in Diffuse Molecular Clouds: The Reflection of Two Photochemistry Regimes in Abundance Relationships (2008, background): “This connection is also related to OH emission that has been detected from intermediate regions around denser molecular CO-emitting clouds (Wannier et al. 1993) and the lack of a correlation between N(13CO) and N(OH) in another sample of molecular clouds (Goldsmith & Li 2005).”
- Clump morphology and evolution in MHD simulations of molecular cloud formation (2008, background): “This supports the notion that giant molecular clouds may consist of molecular clumps immersed in an atomic substrate (e.g., Goldsmith & Li 2005; Hennebelle & Inutsuka 2006).”
- Experimental evidence for glycolaldehyde and ethylene glycol formation by surface hydrogenation of CO molecules under dense molecular cloud conditions (2015, methodology): “In these two runs, a high value for the hydrogen atom density n(H) = 10 cm−3 (Goldsmith & Li 2005) is used as described in Cuppen et al. (2009).”
- KINEMATIC DISTANCES TO MOLECULAR CLOUDS IDENTIFIED IN THE GALACTIC RING SURVEY (2009, background): “H i SELF-ABSORPTION AND 21 cm CONTINUUM ABSORPTION AS A MEAN TO RESOLVE THE KDA The structure and composition of molecular clouds have been discussed by Goldsmith & Li (2005), Goldsmith et al. (2007), and other authors.”
- Molecular Clouds in the Milky Way (2015, background): “Goldsmith & Li (2005) examined the H2 formation timescale but only considered cosmic-ray ionization of molecular hydrogen that occurs in the strongly self-shielded regime of molecular clouds.”
- Cold Dark Clouds: The Initial Conditions for Star Formation (2007, background): “Studies of cold H I in dark clouds, on the other hand, suggest longer timescales > 3×106 yrs (Goldsmith & Li 2005).”