Responsible Tourism: Critical Issues for Conservation and Development
By A. Spenceley. 2012
231 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Demography, Geography, Planning and Development, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1b7ec78e8b3278e1e42fdf04b90f0bab7f1c0b20
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Demography
In Geography, Planning and Development
In Sociology and Political Science
Citations in the corpus
- Inclusive tourism development (2018, background): “Within the Cape Town Declaration (Spenceley, 2012, p. 5), it is clear that responsible tourism includes engendering respect and building local pride, generating greater economic benefits – especially for local people – and involving them in decision-making, encouraging meaningful connections…”
- Tourism–agriculture linkages in rural South Africa: evidence from the accommodation sector (2012, background): “…innovation and practice relating both to pro-poor tourism (Ashley & Haysom, 2008; Ashley & Roe, 2002; Rogerson, 2006; Rogerson & Visser, 2011; Spenceley, 2008) and to maximizing the benefits of tourism for local economic development (Rogerson, 2002, 2006; Rogerson & Rogerson, 2010; Visser &…”
- Community-based tourism as a sustainable solution to maximise impacts locally? The Tsiseb Conservancy case, Namibia (2010, background): “…the empirical level, most case studies assessing tourism impacts at the local level, especially in eastern and southern Africa and in Asia (Ashley, 2000a; Murphy & Halstead, 2003; Murphy & Roe, 2004; Spenceley, 2008; Tao & Wall, 2009), have so far applied the Sustainable Livelihood Approach (SLA).”
- Ecosystem services approach for community-based ecotourism: towards an equitable and sustainable blue economy (2020, background): “For example, fishers and farmers can choose to gain additional income to fishing or farming by developing new tourist services, activities and attractions, as opposed to replacing their primary livelihoods (Gao & Wu, 2017; Spenceley, 2012).”