An Interdisciplinary and Synthetic Approach to Ecological Boundaries

By Mary L. Cadenasso, Steward T. A. Pickett, Kathleen C. Weathers, Susan Bell, T. Benning, M. Carreiro, Todd Dawson. 2003

147 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1b75032c1052ae540c617de62c22615417c36004

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. J. Morrone
2. I. Ferro
3. M. Pinna
4. A. Tribsch
5. F. Dagosta
6. S. Nihei

In Global and Planetary Change

1. J. Morrone

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. J. Morrone
2. I. Ferro

Citations in the corpus

• A conceptual framework for ecosystem stoichiometry: balancing resource supply and demand (2005, unknown): “6, Cadenasso et al. 2003).”
• Biogeographical transition zones: a search for conceptual synthesis (2014, background): “The complexity of such boundaries is evidenced when comparing alternative proposals for the same boundaries by different authors, different taxonomic groups or even the same authors in different times. For example, the original ‘Wallace line’, dividing the Oriental and Australian regions, was modifi”
• Fisheries oceanography and the ecology of early life histories of fishes: a perspective over fifty years (2005, unknown): “The feature problem with ecosystem management is in definition: how do we define an ecosystem in a pragmatic sense and what parameters are to be measured to provide definition (e.g. Alverson, 2004); where are ecosystem boundaries (Cadenasso et al., 2003)?”