A comparison of two different ways to define classes of ultradifferentiable functions

By José Bonet, R. Meise, S. N. Melikhov. 2007

116 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Mathematics, Mathematical Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1b429cdcaf83afac1afef2fafe70d9cda669de82

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Mathematics

1. G. Schindl
2. A. Rainer

In Mathematical Physics

1. G. Schindl
2. A. Rainer

Citations in the corpus

• The convenient setting for non-quasianalytic Denjoy–Carleman differentiable mappings☆ (2008, unknown): “(6) The exponential law holds: For c∞-open V ⊂ F , C∞ ( U,C∞(V ,G) ) ∼= C∞(U × V,G) is a linear diffeomorphism of convenient vector spaces.”
• Composition in ultradifferentiable classes (2012, methodology): “Here we may use the comparison theorems in [8] and argue as above.”