Case and licensing

727 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Agreement and DP-Internal Feature Distribution (2011, background): “Second, as argued by many authors, it is not at all obvious that morphological case is a straightforward spellout of abstract Case features (Landau 2006; Marantz 2000; Sigurðsson 1991), and even if it is – the DP-internal distribution of case morphology might depend”
The case of PRO (2008, background): “…research field, I only refer the reader to some ofmy ownwork (see, in particular, Sigurðsson 1989, 1991, 2003, 2006a, 2006b, 2006c, 2007a, 2007b, 2007d) and to Zaenen, Maling, and Thráinsson (1985), Marantz (2000), McFadden (2004), Nomura (2005), and the numerous references cited in these works.”
Distributed Morphology and the Syntax—Morphology Interface (2007, background): “Draft of December 9, 2005 interpretable features, but no AGR projections in the syntax (see Iatridou (1990), Marantz (1992), Chomsky (1995) for some motivations for this position.)”
On the identity of roots (2014, background): “In order to undersand this generalization, and why the Hiaki agreement pattern represents a challenge to it, we will briefly review the theory of Dependent Case advanced by Marantz (1991), in which the notion of ‘unmarked case’ is defined.”