The Radius of PSR J0740+6620 from NICER and XMM-Newton Data
By M. Miller, F. Lamb, A. Dittmann, S. Bogdanov, Z. Arzoumanian, K. Gendreau, S. Guillot, W. Ho, J. Lattimer, M. Loewenstein and 18 more. Astrophysical Journal Letters, 2021
1,069 citations recorded by the source corpus.
PSR J0740+6620 has a gravitational mass of 2.08 ± 0.07 M ⊙, which is the highest reliably determined mass of any neutron star. As a result, a measurement of its radius will provide unique insight into the properties of neutron star core matter at high densities. Here we report a radius measurement based on fits of rotating hot spot patterns to Neutron Star Interior Composition Explorer (NICER) and X-ray Multi-Mirror (XMM-Newton) X-ray observations. We find that the equatorial circumferential radius of PSR J0740+6620 is 13.7−1.5+2.6 km (68%). We apply our measurement, combined with the previous NICER mass and radius measurement of PSR J0030+0451, the masses of two other ∼2 M ⊙ pulsars, and the tidal deformability constraints from two gravitational wave events, to three different frameworks for equation-of-state modeling, and find consistent results at ∼1.5–5 times nuclear saturation density. For a given framework, when all measurements are included, the radius of a 1.4 M ⊙ neutron star is known to ±4% (68% credibility) and the radius of a 2.08 M ⊙ neutron star is known to ±5%. The full radius range that spans the ±1σ credible intervals of all the radius estimates in the three frameworks is 12.45 ± 0.65 km for a 1.4 M ⊙ neutron star and 12.35 ± 0.75 km for a 2.08 M ⊙ neutron star.
Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Geophysics, Oceanography
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1b3bf1b961fd19fd4bdcab6951696dee56d5966e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Astronomy and Astrophysics
- Michela Mapelli
- D. Holz
- N. Giacobbo
- Mario Spera
- Maya Fishbach
- B. Metzger
- Luca Baiotti
- Juan García-Bellido
In Geophysics
- E. Thrane
- Luca Baiotti
- S. Nissanke
- Luciano Rezzolla
- K. Chatziioannou
- Simon Stevenson
- C. Berry
- T. Littenberg
In Oceanography
- Rana X. Adhikari
- Luca Baiotti
- Michela Mapelli
- Simon Stevenson
- S. Burke-Spolaor
- E. Thrane
- Mario Spera
- Vicky Kalogera
Citations in the corpus
- An Updated Mass–Radius Analysis of the 2017–2018 NICER Data Set of PSR J0030+0451 (2023, methodology): “So far the NICER collaboration has released results for two sources: PSR J0030 + 0451 ( Miller et al. 2019; Riley et al. 2019 ) and the high mass pulsar PSR J0740 + 6620 ( Miller et al. 2021; Riley et al. 2021; Salmi et al. 2022 ) .”
- Progress in Constraining Nuclear Symmetry Energy Using Neutron Star Observables Since GW170817 (2021, background): “indicated that NICER observations favor a mass–radius relation between Case 2 and Case 3 [108].”
- On the Sound Speed in Neutron Stars (2022, methodology): “We impose the mass measurements of J0348+0432 (Antoniadis et al. 2013; M= 2.01± 0.04Me) and of J0740+6620 (Cromartie et al. 2019; Fonseca et al. 2021; M= 2.08± 0.07Me) by rejecting EOSs that have a maximum mass M M2.”
- The Radius of the High-mass Pulsar PSR J0740+6620 with 3.6 yr of NICER Data (2024, background): “Re-sults for two sources have been released (Miller et al. 2019; Riley et al. 2019; Miller et al. 2021; Riley et al. 2021; Salmi et al. 2022, hereafter M21, R21, and S22; Vinciguerra et al. 2024), providing useful constraints for dense matter models (see, e.g., M21; Raaijmakers et al. 2021; Biswas…”
- Observation of Gravitational Waves from the Coalescence of a 2.5–4.5 M ⊙ Compact Object and a Neutron Star (2024, methodology): “Both methods incorporate consistency with the observed heavy pulsars PSR J0740+6620 (Fonseca et al. 2021) and PSR J0348+0432 (Antoniadis et al. 2013) as priors on the EoS and enforce thermodynamic stability and causality.”
- The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Observations and Timing of 68 Millisecond Pulsars (2023, background): “Radio-derived neutron star mass constraints can be employed as priors in mass-to-radius measurements from X-ray light-curve modeling (e.g., Riley et al. 2021; Miller et al. 2021).”