A comparison of the main methods for estimating probabilities of extreme still water levels

130 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A global reanalysis of storm surges and extreme sea levels (2016, unknown): “To address these limitations, more sophisticated statistical methods, such as the r largest or joint probability, could be applied 42 .”
A two-step framework for over-threshold modelling of environmental extremes (2014, background): “…in the literature: Egozcue et al. (2005) studied wave height hazards along the Mediterranean coast of Spain and set the time lag to 4 days; Haigh et al. (2010) studied the extreme sea levels along the English Channel and required the surge peaks to be separated by 30 h at least; USWRC…”
The Tides They Are A‐Changin': A Comprehensive Review of Past and Future Nonastronomical Changes in Tides, Their Driving Mechanisms, and Future Implications (2020, methodology): “…through the advection term in the shallow‐water theory (the water depth enters in the denominator of the friction term in the shallow‐water equations) and nonlinear friction term related to velocity interactions (Flather, 2001; Haigh et al., 2010a; Horsburgh & Wilson, 2007; Zhang et al., 2010).”
Assessing the hydrodynamic boundary conditions for risk analyses in coastal areas: a multivariate statistical approach based on Copula functions (2012, background): “Most former studies only considered the storm surge water levels to determine exceedance probabilities (e.g. Jensen et al., 2006; Haigh et al., 2010; Mudersbach and Jensen, 2010).”