Psychological and neural mechanisms of the affective dimension of pain.
By Donald D. Price. Science, 2000
2,050 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Pharmacology, Physiology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1b2641aa5a2a45b3cc579e1819a02c37a4e896e7
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Tania Singer
- Jean Decety
- Matthew D. Lieberman
- Tor D. Wager
- Boris C. Bernhardt
- Philip L. Jackson
- Claus Lamm
- A. Schore
In Pharmacology
- Marwan N. Baliki
- Irene Tracey
- Katja Wiech
- Apkar Vania Apkarian
- Paul Geha
- Nikola Grahek
- Richard J. Davidson
- Edward E. Smith
In Physiology
- Marwan N. Baliki
- Irene Tracey
- Katja Wiech
- Apkar Vania Apkarian
- Tor D. Wager
- Naomi I. Eisenberger
- Paul Geha
- Matthew D. Lieberman
Citations in the corpus
- The neural correlates of placebo effects: a disruption account (2004, background): “The experience of pain can be divided into sensory and affective aspects, corresponding to the sensory intensity and the unpleasantness of pain, respectively (Melzack and Casey, 1968; Price, 2000).”
- Phantom percepts: Tinnitus and pain as persisting aversive memory networks (2011, background): “Beyond Sensory Percepts: The Affective Dimension Pain has sensory (discriminative) and affective (the “unpleasantness”) dimensions and can induce an avoidance behavior (76).”
- Don't fear ‘fear conditioning’: Methodological considerations for the design and analysis of studies on human fear acquisition, extinction, and return of fear (2017, neutral): “As the cognitive evaluation of the CSs (i.e. ratings) and US calibrations most likely depend on the context (Price, 2000), these should therefore also be carried out within the scanner.”
- Fibromyalgia and overlapping disorders: the unifying concept of central sensitivity syndromes. (2007, background): “The affective dimension of pain, eg, unpleasantness and emotional reaction, is mediated by spinal pathways to limbic structures and medial thalamic nuclei, and by anterior insular cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, and the somatosensory cortical areas (21).”
- The Integration of Negative Affect, Pain, and Cognitive Control in the Cingulate Cortex (2011, background): “It is less clear what to expect for studies of pain, but given the strong association between pain and negative affec”
- Understanding Others: Brain Mechanisms of Theory of Mind and Empathy (2008, background): “These areas are involved in the processing of the affective component of pain, that is, how unpleasant is the subjectively felt pain (Price, 2000).”
- Decreased Functional Connectivity by Aging Is Associated with Cognitive Decline (2012, background): “The insula and ACC are specialized modules for sympathetic efference and interoceptive feedback (Critchley, 2005) and coactive in response to varied forms of salience, including the emotional dimension of pain (Price, 2000), empathy (Singer & Lamm, 2009), and social rejection (Onoda et al.”
- The integrated response of the human cerebro-cerebellar and limbic systems to acupuncture stimulation at ST 36 as evidenced by fMRI (2005, background): “…nuclei, cingulate gyrus, hypothalamus, nucleus accumbens, prefrontal cortex, ventral tegmental area and reticular formation (Heath et al., 1978; Helmchen et al., 2003; Kelly and Strick, 2003; Leiner et al., 1989; Leroi et al., 2002; Paradiso et al., 1999; Price, 2000; Schmahmann and Pandya, 1997).”
- Chronic Pain and the Emotional Brain: Specific Brain Activity Associated with Spontaneous Fluctuations of Intensity of Chronic Back Pain (2006, background): “nonpainful touch (Price, 2000; Apkarian et al., 2005) in anticipation of pain (Ploghaus et al.”
- Feeling Pain and Being in Pain (2007, background): “…they are tuned to respond to novel objects whenever they are directed at or positioned close to the face of an organism: that is, when the target location or direction of 67 motion within the visual receptive field is spatially aligned with the cutaneous receptive field (Price, 2000, p. 1771).”