Decision Aiding, Not Dispute Resolution: Creating Insights through Structured Environmental Decisions

By R. Gregory, T. McDaniels, Daryl Fields. 2001

195 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem services agenda (2012, background): “(63, 138), and multicriterion decision analysis (139), offers proven tools for negotiating across preferences of multiple stakeholders and multiple scales without requiring the monetization of what many regard as intrinsically nonmonetary values.”
From comparative risk assessment to multi-criteria decision analysis and adaptive management: recent developments and applications. (2006, methodology): “, 1997) have examined water uses such as consumption, recreation, conservation, and power generation, while a number of other analyses (Gregory and Failing, 2002; Hämäläinen et al., 2001; Marttunen and Hämäläinen, 1995; Gregory andWellman, 2001; McDaniels, 1999; Gregory et al., 2001; Whitaker and Fo”
Application of Multicriteria Decision Analysis in Environmental Decision Making (2005, background): “Specific applications include water resource management (McDaniels et al. 1999; Gregory et al. 2001), mining (Gregory and Keeny 1994), wilderness preservation (McDaniels and Roessler 1998), and estuary management (Gregory and Wellman 2001).”