The Credit Scoring Toolkit: Theory and Practice for Retail Credit Risk Management and Decision Automation
By Ray H. Anderson. 2007
344 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1b151ff2c3a76fe70b4ea687e0fe8e3d8556842c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Gianluca Bontempi
- Andrea Dal Pozzolo
- Robert Jenssen
- Michael C. Kampffmeyer
- Rogelio Andrade Mancisidor
- Fanyin Zhou
- Feng Shen
- Zhiyong Li
Citations in the corpus
- Adaptive Machine Learning for Credit Card Fraud Detection (2015, background): “Credit card frauds may occur in various ways [9]: just to mention some, we can have stolen card fraud, cardholder-not-present fraud and application fraud: • Stolen card fraud is the most common type of fraud where the fraudster usually tries to spend as much as possible and as quickly as possible.”
- Credit Scoring, Statistical Techniques and Evaluation Criteria: A Review of the Literature (2011, background): “…a logical future development of the subjective credit ratings (see for example, Beynon, 2005) first provided by nineteenth century credit bureaux, that has been driven by a need for objective , fast and consistent decisions, and made possible by advances in technology” (Anderson, 2007, p. 6).”
- Deep generative models for reject inference in credit scoring (2019, methodology): “tive Models, Credit Scoring, Semi-Supervised Learning 1 Introduction Credit scoring uses statistical models to transform the customers’ data into a measure of the borrowers’ ability to repay the loan [2]. These models are developed, commonly, based on accepted applications because the bank knows whe”
- Inferring the outcomes of rejected loans: an application of semisupervised clustering (2019, methodology): “Extrapolation is by polarized parcelling in Anderson (2007), and both polarized and fuzzy parcelling are associated with extrapolation approaches, which have a strong assumption that the same set of information is available for both old and new scorecards.”