Guidelines to manage sage grouse populations and their habitats.

By J. Connelly, Michael A. Schroeder, A. Sands, C. Braun. 2000

650 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1ab561b6fe5d0aaf762a3eb7f25dba1b753b075d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Survival of Greater Sage-Grouse Chicks and Broods in the Northern Great Basin (2009, methodology): “We recommend protection of sage-grouse broodrearing habitat that is at the ecological site potential or that meets management guidelines provided in Connelly et al. (2000).”
Movements and Survival of Juvenile Greater Sage-Grouse in Southeastern Idaho (2006, background): “…habitat resulting from long-term impacts, including agricultural expansion (Swenson et al. 1987), drought (Connelly and Braun 1997), fire (Connelly et al. 2000b, 2004), invasive species (Connelly et al. 2004), and livestock-related activities (Beck and Mitchell 2000, Crawford et al.…”
Recovery of Big Sagebrush Following Fire in Southwest Montana (2007, background): “Presumably sage grouse populations can be limited by the loss of any 1 of these habitat types (Connelly et al. 2000; Roscoe 2002).”
Comparison of Medusahead-Invaded and Noninvaded Wyoming Big Sagebrush Steppe in Southeastern Oregon (2008, background): “The loss of sagebrush with medusahead invasion would negatively affect sage-grouse (Patterson 1952; Wallestad et al. 1975; Connelly et al. 2000), other sagebrush obligates (Green and Flinders 1980; Shipley et al. 2006), and sagebrushfacultative wildlife species (MacCracken and Hansen 1981; Austin…”
A Meta-analysis of Greater Sage-grouse Centrocercus urophasianus Nesting and Brood-rearing Habitats (2007, methodology): “Our analysis indicatedthat the range (95%C.I.s)ofvegetationmeasurementsencompassed those in the guidelines published by Connelly et al. (2000), recommending 15-25% sagebrush cover, .”
Characteristics and Dynamics of Greater Sage-Grouse Populations (2011, background): “It slowly became evident that sage-grouse did not fit the typical paradigm for upland game birds because populations tended to have low winter mortality and relatively high annual survival, and many populations were migratory (Schroeder et al. 1999; Connelly et al. 1988, 2000c).”
Nest Predation of Greater Sage-Grouse in Relation to Microhabitat Factors and Predators (2010, background): “Current management guidelines recommend nesting habitat with 15–25% sagebrush cover (Connelly et al. 2000) and our data suggest that sage-grouse may benefit from 20– 30% sagebrush cover and L40% total shrub cover.”
Managing Multiple Vital Rates To Maximize Greater Sage Grouse Population Growth (2012, methodology): “Management actions to enhance survival rates may be most important in seasons when survival is lower: March to November in most years (Schroeder et al. 1999; Connelly et al. 2000b, 2011; Moynahan et al. 2006; Anthony and Willis 2009).”