Industry 4.0
By A. Gilchrist. Apress, 2016
2,086 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1ab11cb271e623cec03d303803f132a7152b8325
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
- Sachin S. Kamble
- Angappa Gunasekaran
- Neelkanth C. Dhone
- J. M. Maqueira‐Marín
- J. Garza‐Reyes
- José Moyano‐Fuentes
- Pedro José Martínez-Jurado
- Mats Winroth
Citations in the corpus
- Smart Factory of Industry 4.0: Key Technologies, Application Case, and Challenges (2018, background): “0 strategy [6] and China manufacturing 2025 [7] have”
- Digital technologies, innovation, and skills: emerging trajectories and challenges (2021, background): “One vision of the future of digital technologies, the Industry 4.0 “paradigm,” was introduced by the German government in 2013 and has attracted a great deal of attention (Kagermann, 2015; Lasi et al., 2014).”
- Design and application of Internet of things-based warehouse management system for smart logistics (2018, background): “0 can be described as the increasing digitisation and automation of the manufacturing environment as well as the creation of a digital value chain that enables communication between products, the environment and business partners (Lasi et al. 2014).”
- Assessing relations between Circular Economy and Industry 4.0: a systematic literature review (2019, background): “0 is a paradigm referring to a wide range of concepts, whose clear classification – as well as their precise distinction – is not possible (Lasi et al. 2014).”
- Defining and assessing industry 4.0 maturity levels – case of the defence sector (2018, background): “Gilchrist (2016, 58) states the main aim of the Internet of Things is to ‘provide enough connectivity and functionality to enable a computer system to sense information autonomously without the interaction of humans’.”
- A Survey on Industrial Internet of Things: A Cyber-Physical Systems Perspective (2018, background): “potential to improve the productivity, efficiency, safety and intelligence of industrial factories and plants [15], [16].”
- Industry 4.0, global value chains and international business (2017, background): “…revolution, following mechanization (the fi rst revolution) in the nineteenth century, the intensive use of electrical energy for mass production (the second revolution) in the early part of the twentieth century and widespread digitalization (the third revolution) in the 1970s (Lasi et al. , 2014).”
- 6G and Beyond: The Future of Wireless Communications Systems (2020, background): “Over the past few years, Industry 4.0 [13] has been the driving force behind industrial automation based on the concepts of supply chain optimization, autonomous equipment, additive manufacturing, data analytics, and the Internet of Things (IoT).”
- Design Principles for Industrie 4.0 Scenarios (2016, background): “0 promises substantially increased operational effectiveness as well as the development of entirely new business models, services, and products [2] [4] [5].”
- The smart circular economy: A digital-enabled circular strategies framework for manufacturing companies (2020, background): “Furthermore, DTs, also known as Industry 4.0 (Kagermann, Helbig, Hellinger, & Wahlster, 2013; Lasi, Fettke, Kemper, Feld, & Hoffmann, 2014; Liao, Deschamps, Loures, & Ramos, 2017), are transforming operations management in fields such as automation and industrial manufacturing, supply chain…”
- Big data for cyber physical systems in industry 4.0: a survey (2019, background): “Industry 4.0 originates from a project for advanced manufacturing vision supported by the German government in 2011 (Lasi et al. 2014; Xu, Xu, and Li 2018) and has become a widely-used concept since then.”
- Organizational learning paths based upon industry 4.0 adoption: An empirical study with Brazilian manufacturers (2020, background): “However, Wan et al. (2015) and Rüßmann et al. (2015) emphasize that I4.”
- Blockchain-Assisted Secure Device Authentication for Cross-Domain Industrial IoT (2020, background): “0 [1] and other similar concepts [2] mentioned frequently in recent years,”
- Integrated Sensing and Communications: Toward Dual-Functional Wireless Networks for 6G and Beyond (2021, background): “, indoor human activity recognition [58] (∼1 cm), autonomous robots and manufacturing [59] (∼5 mm).”
- Information and digital technologies of Industry 4.0 and Lean supply chain management: a systematic literature review (2020, background): “0 becomes a success at the internal and SC levels (Smit et al. 2016).”
- Industry 4.0: A Bibliometric Review of Its Managerial Intellectual Structure and Potential Evolution in the Service Industries (2019, background): “These two concepts (i.e, CPSs and IoT) are very similar, even if they have emerged in two different epochs; however, the definition of CPSs seems to embrace a broader range of application fields (Gilchrist, 2016).”
- Reshoring and insourcing: drivers and future research directions (2016, background): “0 developments (Lasi et al., 2014) or smart-robotic process automation (Institute for Robotic Process Automation, 2015), firms competing in less technology-intense environments are also less affected by drivers of asset specificity.”