Immediate responses and adaptative strategies of three olive cultivars under contrasting water availability regimes: Changes on structure and chemical composition of foliage and oxidative damage

By E. Bacelar, Dário Santos, J. Moutinho-Pereira, B. Gonçalves, Helena Ferreira, C. Correia. 2006

207 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1aa428485832814cf3918bcc9a4e020409a46082

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Plant Science

Citations in the corpus

Physiological and anatomical changes induced by drought in two olive cultivars (cv Zalmati and Chemlali) (2010, background): “Similar results have also been documented for other olive cultivars (Bacelar et al. 2006; Guerfel et al. 2009), and for other plant species, such as grapevines (Escalona et al.”
Physiological responses of different olive genotypes to drought conditions (2009, background): “Some studies have already dealt with WP decrease in olive cultivars as a result of water deficit in the leaf tissue (Xiloyiannis et al. 1988; Dichio et al. 1997; Chartzoulakis et al. 1999; Bacelar et al. 2006).”
Improving growth and yield of cowpea by foliar application of chitosan under water stress (2012, background): “A thicker upper epidermis (including upper cuticle) and a thicker palisade parenchyma in these treatments may enhance survival and growth under water stress conditions by improving water relations and providing higher protection for the inner tissues (Bacelar et al. 2006), increasing yield.”
Effect of drought stress and selenium spraying on photosynthesis and antioxidant activity of spring barley (2013, background): “Reductions in photosynthetic performance under water stress have also been observed by Tognetti et al. (2005), Bacelar et al. (2006) and Ben Ahmed et al. (2009).”
Comparative impacts of water stress on the leaf anatomy of a drought-resistant and a drought-sensitive olive cultivar (2010, background): “Generally, those leaves that develop under drought conditions have lower SLA values than those that develop under optimum watering conditions (Bacelar et al., 2006).”