Father Involvement in Urban Low‐Income Fathers: Baseline Associations and Changes Resulting From Preventive Intervention

By Shauna L. Rienks, M. Wadsworth, H. Markman, Lindsey Einhorn, E. Etter. 2011

91 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Demography, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1a7a256fe2e1fcb0d05767073fdf8fa3557bf0cb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Demography

1. P. Cowan
2. C. Cowan

In Social Psychology

1. C. Panter-Brick
2. P. Cowan
3. C. Cowan
4. M. Eggerman

In Sociology and Political Science

1. P. Cowan
2. C. Cowan

Citations in the corpus

• Practitioner Review: Engaging fathers – recommendations for a game change in parenting interventions based on a systematic review of the global evidence (2014, background): “…participants to test this important proposition have found that engaging with both parents, rather than one, may indeed deliver benefits (Besnard, Capuano, Verlaan, Poulin, & Vitaro, 2009; Cia et al., 2010; Cowan et al., 2009; May et al., 2013; Rienks, Wadsworth, Markman, Einhorn, & Etter, 2011).”
• Controversies in Couple Relationship Education (CRE): Overlooked Evidence and Implications for Research and Policy (2014, methodology): “The Supporting Father Involvement program (SFI, P. Cowan et al., 2009) is the only study in addition to Rienks et al (2011) that used an RCT research design to evaluate a couples approach to father involvement, but SFI contrasted a couples group and a fathers-only group with the same leaders and…”