Regression Analysis of Country Effects Using Multilevel Data: A Cautionary Tale
By Mark L. Bryan, S. Jenkins. Social Science Research Network, 2013
138 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Cross-national differences in outcomes are often analysed using regression analysis of multilevel country datasets, examples of which include the ECHP, ESS, EU-SILC, EVS, ISSP, and SHARE. We review the regression methods applicable to this data structure, pointing out problems with the assessment of country-level factors that appear not to be widely appreciated, and illustrate our arguments using Monte-Carlo simulations and analysis of women's employment probabilities and work hours using EU SILC data. With large sample sizes of individuals within each country but a small number of countries, analysts can reliably estimate individual-level effects within each country but estimates of parameters summarising country effects are likely to be unreliable. Multilevel (hierarchical) modelling methods are commonly used in this context but they are no panacea.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1a7750911a7989eb75e067608b07b881bdabaccc
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- P. D. Caju
- T. Zavadil
- Sónia Costa
- J. M. Casado
- Olympia Bover
- Ernesto Villanueva
- Eva Sierminska
- Yvonne McCarthy
Citations in the corpus
- The Distribution of Debt Across Euro Area Countries: The Role of Individual Characteristics, Institutions and Credit Conditions (2013, methodology): “…country effect endogeneity but not for country-effect endogeneity operating interactively through other household characteristics.9 9On a related note, Bryan and Jenkins (2013) recommend using a two-step approach similar to ours to analyze the impact of country-level variables on…”