Search for B→K(*)νν¯ and invisible quarkonium decays
By E. Pous. 2013
172 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1a6c98083c83cf110c99d6b24c7ab2cfc42975e8
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Ediotors A. Cerri
- Vladimir Vava Gligorov
- Marco Ciuchini
- David M. Straub
- J. Camalich
- S. Malvezzi
- T. Blake
- E. Franco
Citations in the corpus
- Opportunities in Flavour Physics at the HL-LHC and HE-LHC (2018, background): “The current bounds on b ! s⌫⌫̄, now only O(1) above the SM [1068, 1069], can also put severe constraints on particular NP models [1070, 1071].”
- Rare $B$ Decays as Tests of the Standard Model (2016, background): “Table 6: 90% CL upper bounds on b → qνν̄ branching fractions from BaBar [272, 270, 273] and Belle [271].”
- New Physics in $${\varvec{b \rightarrow s \ell ^+ \ell ^-}}$$ confronts new data on lepton universality (2019, background): “At the present experimental sensitivity [199], this channel turns out to have a relatively mild interplay with b→ s`+`− measurements [84, 111].”
- Simultaneous explanation of the RK and R(D(⁎)) puzzles (2014, unknown): “[44] considers the following processes/observables: (i) b → s`+`− (` = μ, e): B → K∗μ+μ−, B0 s → φμ+μ−, RK , (ii) b → cτν̄τ : RD(∗) , (iii) b → sνν̄: B → K(∗)νν̄ [45, 46].”