Some notes on the correlation between fracture and defect statistics: Are Weibull statistics valid for very small specimens?

By R. Danzer. 2006

139 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ceramics and Composites, Civil and Structural Engineering, Metals and Alloys

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1a52c488d656713b411d9491f83e7af5e4389a25

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ceramics and Composites

1. A. Mouritz
2. G. Royer-Carfagni
3. Gabriele Pisano
4. S. Feih

In Civil and Structural Engineering

1. S. Feih
2. A. Mouritz

In Metals and Alloys

1. A. Mouritz
2. S. Feih

Citations in the corpus

• The Lower Bound for Glass Strength and Its Interpretation with Generalized Weibull Statistics for Structural Applications (2016, background): “However, there is a wealth of evidence that points to its inability to capture the experimental data associated with small failure probabilities (and lowest strengths) (Danzer 2006; Yankelevsky 2014; Pisano and Royer-Carfagni 2015a). It is precisely this left-hand-side tail of the distribution that ”
• Tensile properties of carbon fibres and carbon fibre–polymer composites in fire (2012, background): “However, it is noted that the small number of tested fibres for each heat treatment condition (30 samples) does not allow for identification of the statistical failure distribution [27].”