Fourier's Law: a Challenge for Theorists

By F. Bonetto, J. Lebowitz, Luc Rey-Bellet. 2000

326 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We present a selective overview of the current state of our knowledge (more precisely of ourignorance) regarding the derivation of Fourier's Law, ${\bf J}(\br) =-\kappa {\bf \nabla}T(\br)$; ${\bf J}$ the heat flux, $T$ the temperature and $\kappa$, the heat conductivity. This law is empirically well tested for both fluids and crystals, when the temperature varies slowly on the microscopic scale, with $\kappa$ an intrinsic property which depends only on the system's equilibrium parameters, such as the local temperature and density. There is however at present no rigorous mathematical derivation of Fourier's law and ipso facto of Kubo's formula for $\kappa$, involving integrals over equilibrium time correlations, for any system (or model) with a deterministic, e.g. Hamiltonian, microscopic evolution.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1a45a113cb77af7b3e35c5848ae3e5307f024bfd

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

  1. A. Dhar
  2. Herbert Spohn
  3. Bernard Derrida
  4. Dibyendu Roy
  5. Sheldon Goldstein
  6. Joel Lebowitz
  7. Dmitry Dolgopyat
  8. Jani Lukkarinen

Citations in the corpus