DNA barcodes reveal cryptic host-specificity within the presumed polyphagous members of a genus of parasitoid flies (Diptera: Tachinidae).
By M. Smith, N. Woodley, D. Janzen, W. Hallwachs, Paul D. N. Hebert. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2006
606 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1a40a5a6dac6b19240737307410f33cb159514f3
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
- P. Taberlet
- F. Pompanon
- Robert H. Hanner
- R. Ward
- Paul D. N. Hebert
- A. Valentini
- R. Pringle
- Matthew C. Hutchinson
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- J. Gibbs
- Robert H. Hanner
- R. Ward
- Mehrdad Hajibabaei
- Paul D. N. Hebert
- Damon P. Little
- N. Desneux
- Dennis W. Stevenson
In Insect Science
Citations in the corpus
- Revealing secret liaisons: DNA barcoding changes our understanding of food webs (2010, background): “…in which molecular markers have resolved multiple specialised cryptic taxa within what was thought to be a generalist species (Kankare et al., 2005; Smith et al., 2006, 2008; Bickford et al., 2007; Heraty et al., 2007; Pénzes et al., 2009; Nicholls et al., 2010), but contrasts with them by…”
- Cryptic species within the wheat curl mite Aceria tosichella (Keifer) (Acari : Eriophyoidea), revealed by mitochondrial, nuclear and morphometric data (2012, background): “…revealed that presumed polyphagous taxa are, in fact, complexes of cryptic species that are specialised to different hosts (e.g. Drés and Mallet 2002; Hebert et al. 2003; Blair et al. 2005; Stireman et al. 2005; Smith et al. 2006; Rach et al. 2008; Skoracka and Dabert 2010).”
- A comparison of algorithms for the identification of specimens using DNA barcodes: examples from gymnosperms (2007, background): “…et al., 2000, 2005; Floyd et al., 2002; Vra˚lstad et al., 2002; Rosling et al., 2003; Tedersoo et al., 2003; De Ley et al., 2005; Kopchinskiy et al., 2005; Kress et al., 2005; Markmann and Tautz, 2005; Monaghan et al., 2005; Steinke et al., 2005; Vences et al., 2005a,b; Smith et al., 2006).”
- Molecular markers for biodiversity analysis of wildlife animals: a brief review (2009, methodology): “The COI–DNA barcode has been testified as a tool for spe� cies identification, biodiversity analysis and discovery for morphospecies of Belvosia parasitoid flies (Smith et al., 2006).”
- Refined Global Analysis of Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Sternorrhyncha: Aleyrodoidea: Aleyrodidae) Mitochondrial Cytochrome Oxidase 1 to Identify Species Level Genetic Boundaries (2010, background): “It is therefore likely that molecular data will aid in identifying the species-level boundaries within B. tabaci as it has with other complexes (Hebert et al. 2003a, Ward et al. 2005, Smith et al. 2006).”
- Parasitoids, predators and PCR: the use of diagnostic molecular markers in biological control of Arthropods (2007, methodology): “However, extensive host-rearing records and DNA barcoding (of both the COI and ITS1 regions) of approximately 20 morphospecies of Belvosia revealed that there are 32 species, many being cryptic species with a high degree of specificity for their lepidopteran host (Smith et al. 2006).”
- DNA barcoding: how it complements taxonomy, molecular phylogenetics and population genetics. (2007, background): “Alternate markers have also been used where COI sequences have not been produced robustly or are shown to be divergent within species [18] or as further molecular evidence in the discovery of cryptic species [ 19 ].”
- Resolving Food-Web Structure (2020, background): “The discovery of such cryptic species has accelerated with the advent of modern molecular diagnostics, especially DNA barcoding (Hebert et al. 2004; Smith et al. 2006, 2007, 2008; Janzen et al. 2017).”
- Integrating genetic data into management of marine resources: how can we do it better? (2008, background): “More broadly, genetic data are widely used in many aspects of global biodiversity conservation, including identification of species (Hebert et al. 2004; Smith et al. 2006) and conservation units (Waples 1991; Moritz 1994; Crandall et al.”
- A minimalist barcode can identify a specimen whose DNA is degraded (2006, neutral): “2006; Smith et al .”
- DNA barcoding for ecologists. (2009, background): “Several morphospecies of tachinid parasitoidflies thought to be generalist actually corresponded to many different cryptic species that were less generalist or even specialist [ 25 ,26].”
- Current progress in DNA barcoding and future implications for entomology (2011, background): “Smith et al. (2006) evaluated the feasibility of using DNA barcodes for studying parasitoid insects.”
- Integrative taxonomy identifies new (and old) species in the Lasioglossum (Dialictus) tegulare (Robertson) species group (Hymenoptera, Halictidae) (2009, background): “…amounts of differentiation are commonly found among species in the Halictidae (Wheeler 1928; Michener 2007), as well as in many other insects (Hebert et al. 2004; Smith et al. 2006, 2008) and as noted above, genetically well-differentiated species are sometimes morphologically indistinguishable.”