A graphical method for exploring heterogeneity in meta‐analyses: application to a meta‐analysis of 65 trials

By B. Baujat, C. Mahé, Jean-Pierre Pignon, C. Hill. Statistics in Medicine, 2002

639 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Otorhinolaryngology, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1a3acf878c0d473f45e0d49448ae7d1a173b0bcb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Statistics and Probability

1. L. Ray
2. M. Magill

Citations in the corpus

• Cognitive-behavioral treatment with adult alcohol and illicit drug users: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. (2009, background): “However, trimmed estimates, with high weight or outlier studies removed (Baujat et al., 2002), were additionally provided with moderator subgroup data.”
• Meta-analysis of chemotherapy in head and neck cancer (MACH-NC): an update on 93 randomised trials and 17,346 patients. (2009, neutral): “ostatistics and Epidemiology, s, 94 805 VILLEJUIF cedex, tious conclusions; indeed, five trials which represented about 7% of the data explained most of the heterogeneity and when they were excluded the higher benefit of concomitant chemotherapy disappeared [3].”