Delay Compensation in Model Predictive Current Control of a Three-Phase Inverter
By Patricio Cortes, José Raúl Rodríguez Rodríguez, César A. Silva, Alexis Flores. IEEE transactions on industrial electronics (1982. Print), 2012
1,007 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Control and Systems Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1a28533770644ad2e94a598b2b60d959eee9c563
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Control and Systems Engineering
- Tobias Geyer
- José Raúl Rodríguez Rodríguez
- Tomislav Dragicevic
- Yongchang Zhang
- Mateja Novak
- Sergio Vazquez
- Leopoldo García Franquelo
- Christian A. Rojas
In Electrical and Electronic Engineering
- Tobias Geyer
- Yongchang Zhang
- José Raúl Rodríguez Rodríguez
- Leopoldo García Franquelo
- Sergio Vazquez
- Haitao Yang
- Tomislav Dragicevic
- Mateja Novak
Citations in the corpus
- Weighting Factor Design in Model Predictive Control of Power Electronic Converters: An Artificial Neural Network Approach (2019, methodology): “Delay was remunerated utilizing the strategy given in [31].”
- Model-Free Predictive Current Control for Interior Permanent-Magnet Synchronous Motor Drives Based on Current Difference Detection Technique (2014, methodology): “Similar to the MBPCC [11], [12], the next switching state that minimizes a cost function can be determined at the present sampling time and then to directly trigger the inverter in the next sampling interval.”
- A Simplified Finite-Control-Set Model-Predictive Control for Power Converters (2014, methodology): “In the experiment, time-delay compensation [29] is applied to both the conventional FCS-MPC and the simplified FCS-MPC.”
- Model Predictive Torque Control of Induction Motor Drives With Optimal Duty Cycle Control (2014, background): “In real-time implementation, one-step delay between the commanding voltage and the real voltage caused by digital processing will deteriorate the performance of MPTC [20], [22], [32].”
- Finite Control Set Model Predictive Current Control for Grid-Connected Voltage-Source Converters With LCL Filters: A Study Based on Different State Feedbacks (2016, background): “In [40], it is shown that the effect of the time delay has a negative impact on the prediction and control performance.”
- Model Predictive Control for Power Converters and Drives: Advances and Trends (2017, methodology): “1, where the reference and predicted currents at instant k + 2 are used in order to compensate for the digital implementation delay [21].”
- State of the Art of Finite Control Set Model Predictive Control in Power Electronics (2013, background): “The effect of the time delay has a large impact on the prediction, especially when an one-sample horizon algorithm is considered, and therefore a delay compensation scheme must be implemented [17].”
- Deadbeat Predictive Current Control of Permanent-Magnet Synchronous Motors with Stator Current and Disturbance Observer (2017, background): “Moreover, control delay of digital control system, including current sampling delay, duty ratio refreshing delay, and other factors, would greatly reduce the system control performance [19]–[22].”
- Model predictive control of high power converters and industrial drives (2016, methodology): “4 Utility-Scale Power Electronics for the Grid The power system is being overhauled by adding flexible ac transmission systems (FACTS) to it to achieve smart grid capabilities and to enhance the power flow [7, 8].”