When What You See Is What You Get

By Sarah J. Gervais, T. K. Vescio, Jill Allen. 2011

137 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Marketing

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1a27f6b56b1c9cb846e0d705c18be60a686f7b0e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Sarah J. Gervais
2. Jens Förster
3. T. K. Vescio
4. Joel R. Anderson

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Sarah J. Gervais
2. T. K. Vescio
3. Courtney Heldreth
4. Scott P. Johnson
5. Elise Holland
6. Joel R. Anderson
7. Arianne M. Holland
8. Jens Förster

In Marketing

1. Sarah J. Gervais
2. Arianne M. Holland
3. Michael D Dodd
4. L. Dannenberg

Citations in the corpus

• Revisiting the Jezebel Stereotype (2018, background): “Although the objectifying gaze is an important manifestation of objectification (e.g., Fredrickson & Roberts, 1997; Gervais et al., 2011), it is not the only one.”
• My Eyes Are Up Here: The Nature of the Objectifying Gaze Toward Women (2013, background): “As we continue to understand how women respond to the objectifying gaze (Moradi and Huang 2008; Gervais et al. 2011), the present research contributes to further understanding of when and why perceivers exhibit the objectifying gaze toward women in the first place.”
• Seeing women as objects: The sexual body part recognition bias (2012, methodology): “In a related vein, Gervais et al. (2011b) found that women’s bodies were seen as fungible (i.e., interchangeable) with other similar bodies.”
• How threats to masculinity sequentially cause public discomfort, anger, and ideological dominance over women. (2015, background): “, 2012) and undermines women’s actual performance (e.g., Gervais & Vescio, 2012; Gervais et al., 2011).”