Deliberation, Preference Uncertainty, and Voting Rules

By David Austen-Smith, Timothy Feddersen. American Political Science Review, 2006

264 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management Science and Operations Research, Safety Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1a1fb8bc07b1a76ffdadd6e2e1d68b3212236596

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Jacob K. Goeree
2. Leeat Yariv

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. Jacob K. Goeree
2. Leeat Yariv
3. Thomas R. Palfrey

In Safety Research

1. Jacob K. Goeree
2. Leeat Yariv
3. Thomas R. Palfrey
4. Charles A. Holt

Citations in the corpus

• Certifiable Pre‐Play Communication: Full Disclosure (2014, unknown): “Schulte (2010) showed a similar result for the specific case of the jury model, and Mathis (2011) extended it to the case in which preferences lead to nested acceptance 27 See, for example, Austen-Smith and Feddersen (2006).”
• AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF COLLECTIVE DELIBERATION (2011, background): “Coughlan (2000) and Austen-Smith and Feddersen (2005, 2006 ) were among the …rst to point out that the availability of particular communication protocols 3 can dramatically alter collective decisions, while Gerardi and Yariv (2007) show that unrestricted communication (such as jury deliberation)…”