Comparison of methods for detecting bottlenecks from microsatellite loci
By Ellen G. Williamson-Natesan. Conservation Genetics, 2006
312 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cancer Research, Genetics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1a1be3db731f2802139dbe0d35598719672a34a7
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cancer Research
- R. Bijlsma
- Cino Pertoldi
- Volker Loeschcke
- K. Hundertmark
- David A. Lytle
- Ivan C. Phillipsen
- L. V. Daele
In Genetics
- R. Bijlsma
- Cino Pertoldi
- Volker Loeschcke
- K. Hundertmark
- David A. Lytle
- Ivan C. Phillipsen
- L. V. Daele
Citations in the corpus
- Founder effect and bottleneck signatures in an introduced, insular population of elk (2010, methodology): “Both methods were found to have low Type I and Type II error rates compared with other methods (Williamson-Natesan 2005).”
- Conservation genetics in a globally changing environment: present problems, paradoxes and future challenges (2007, methodology): “Commonly used methods include gametic disequilibrium, heterozygote excess and the so-called “temporal method” (Turner 2001; Pearse and Crandall 2004 for a review, Williamson-Natesan 2005 ).”
- Aquatic insects in a sea of desert: population genetic structure is shaped by limited dispersal in a naturally fragmented landscape (2013, methodology): “Although the heterozygosity-based test in BOTTLENECK is suitable for uncovering evidence of recent, moderate population bottlenecks, the M-ratio method (Garza and Williamson 2001) is better for detecting bottlenecks that occurred in the more distant past (Williamson-Natesan 2005).”