A draft genome of Yersinia pestis from victims of the Black Death

By Sara Sheehan, Kirsten I. Bos, V. Schuenemann, G. B. Golding, Hernán A. Burbano, Nicholas Waglechner, B. Coombes, Joseph B. McPhee, S. DeWitte, M. Meyer and 7 more. Nature, 2011

676 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Technological advances in DNA recovery and sequencing have drastically expanded the scope of genetic analyses of ancient specimens to the extent that full genomic investigations are now feasible and are quickly becoming standard. This trend has important implications for infectious disease research because genomic data from ancient microbes may help to elucidate mechanisms of pathogen evolution and adaptation for emerging and re-emerging infections. Here we report a reconstructed ancient genome of Yersinia pestis at 30-fold average coverage from Black Death victims securely dated to episodes of pestilence-associated mortality in London, England, 1348–1350. Genetic architecture and phylogenetic analysis indicate that the ancient organism is ancestral to most extant strains and sits very close to the ancestral node of all Y. pestis commonly associated with human infection. Temporal estimates suggest that the Black Death of 1347–1351 was the main historical event responsible for the introduction and widespread dissemination of the ancestor to all currently circulating Y. pestis strains pathogenic to humans, and further indicates that contemporary Y. pestis epidemics have their origins in the medieval era. Comparisons against modern genomes reveal no unique derived positions in the medieval organism, indicating that the perceived increased virulence of the disease during the Black Death may not have been due to bacterial phenotype. These findings support the notion that factors other than microbial genetics, such as environment, vector dynamics and host susceptibility, should be at the forefront of epidemiological discussions regarding emerging Y. pestis infections.

Subfields: Genetics, Molecular Biology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/19f69132eadb6830ff89a3b7e9b559d00f3b0688

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Genetics

  1. Ziheng Yang
  2. Bruce Rannala
  3. Michael D. Martin
  4. Tommy E. Murphy
  5. Aurelien Ginolhac
  6. Ludovic Antoine Alexandre Orlando
  7. Hákon Jónsson
  8. Mikkel Schubert

In Molecular Biology

  1. Ziheng Yang
  2. Bruce Rannala
  3. Eske Willerslev
  4. Michael D. Martin
  5. H. Buermans
  6. Aurelien Ginolhac
  7. Ludovic Antoine Alexandre Orlando
  8. Hákon Jónsson

In Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

  1. Ziheng Yang

Citations in the corpus