Testing the Stability of Implied Probability Density Functions
By Rob Bliss, Nikolaos Panigirtzoglou. 2002
339 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Finance
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/19b1ecab373449c64c0befaa333092930af0f691
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Finance
- Matthias R. Fengler
- Allan M. Malz
- K. Hadri
- R. Bu
- Bernhard Brunner
- Yisong S. Tian
- George J. Jiang
- R. Hafner
Citations in the corpus
- Extracting Model-Free Volatility from Option Prices: An Examination of the VIX Index (2007, background): “, Bahra [1997], Jackwerth [1999], Bliss and Panigirtzoglou [2000], Bondarenko [2000], and Anagnou et al.”
- The Generalized Extreme Value (GEV) Distribution, Implied Tail Index and Option Pricing (2011, neutral): “Even though the three-month LIBOR market does not provide a maturity-matched interest rate, it has the advantages of liquidity and of approximating the actual market borrowing and lending rates faced by option market participants (Bliss and Panigirtzoglou [2004]).”
- Estimating option implied risk‐neutral densities using spline and hypergeometric functions (2007, positive): “The construction of the SML method proposed by Bliss and Panigirtzoglou (2002) requires that the implied volatility smile be smoothed in delta space.”
- Why does Implied Risk Aversion Smile (2007, neutral): “Although the smile e ect in option implied volatility has received considerable attention, very few papers have sought to investigate the reasons for the implied risk aversion smile.”
- Arbitrage-free smoothing of the implied volatility surface (2009, methodology): “The set-up we used is borrowed from Bliss and Panigirtzoglou (2002) developed for testing the stability of state price densities.”
- Using Markets to Inform Policy: The Case of the Iraq War (2009, neutral): “Bliss and Panigirtzoglou (2002) compare the smoothed volatility method exemplified by Aït-Sahalia and Lo (1998) with other methods for estimating option pricing functions, finding that it more robust to perturbations in option prices.”
- The Finite Moment Log Stable Process and Option Pricing (2003, neutral): “Bliss and Panigirtzoglou (2000) provide a detailed discussion on the sources of errors and their implications for the weights.”
- Closed-form transformations from risk-neutral to real-world distributions (2007, neutral): “…Kelly (1996)], non-parametric estimates [Ait-Sahalia and Lo (1998)], multi-parameter discrete distributions [Jackwerth and Rubinstein (1996)] and densities implied by smile functions, defined by either polynomials [Shimko (1993), Malz (1997)] or spline functions [Bliss and Panigirtzoglou (2002a)].”
- A Simple and Reliable Way to Compute Option-Based Risk-Neutral Distributions (2014, methodology): “Bliss and Panigirtzoglou (2002) and (2004) implement flat-line extrapolation of a natural spline by introducing additional synthetic data points with implied volatilities equal to those observed for the highest and lowest exercise prices and with exercise prices outside that range.”
- Using Copulas to Construct Bivariate Foreign Exchange Distributions with an Application to the Sterling Exchange Rate Index (2005, neutral): “The advantages and disadvantages of parametric and smile-interpolation approaches are discussed in Bliss and Panigirtzoglou (2002).”
- Estimation of Risk-Neutral Densities Using Positive Convolution Approximation (2003, neutral): “The method is used in applications by Leahy and Thomas (1996), Campa et al. (1998), and many others.”
- Arbitrage-free estimation of the risk-neutral density from the implied volatility smile (2002, methodology): “In contrast to our method, such a situation is difficult to handle using the Bliss and Panigirtzoglou (2002) method.”
- Modelling the Implied Probability of Stock Market Movements (2003, neutral): “As Bliss and Panigirtzoglou (2002) discuss, the RND can be obtained by means of five methods: Specification of the stochastic process, implied trees, finite differences, 8 See Hull (2000).”