Beyond territory: A geographical perspective on knowledge creation and innovation

By Dieter Franz Kogler, H. Bathelt, Maryann P. Feldman. 2012

121 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Demography, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/197bc73adb366cab1ceb52718580f04222c31e03

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Demography

1. Henning Kroll
2. Arne Isaksen
3. Michaela Trippl
4. Ron Martin
5. Nick Williams
6. Tim Vorley

In Political Science and International Relations

1. Michaela Trippl
2. Arne Isaksen
3. R. Hassink
4. R. Capello
5. Henning Kroll
6. Ron A. Boschma
7. Dominique Foray
8. Markus Grillitsch

In Sociology and Political Science

1. R. Hassink
2. Arne Isaksen
3. R. Capello
4. Michaela Trippl

Citations in the corpus

• Efforts to Implement Smart Specialization in Practice—Leading Unlike Horses to the Water (2015, unknown): “…related variety (Frenken et al., 2007; Boschma & Iammarino, 2009), specialized diversification (McCann & OrtegaArgilés, 2014a), regional branching (Boschma & Frenken, 2011; Boschma & Gianelle, 2013), local path creation (Martin, 2010), path extension (Martin & Sunley, 2006; Isaksen, 2014),…”
• From theory to practice in smart specialization strategy: emerging limits and possible future trajectories (2016, background): “…or can hardly be defined in a sensible manner as there are in fact too many viable and legitimate techno-economic domains at one time (related variety and technological branching versus specialization) (Asheim, Boschma, & Cooke, 2011; Boschma & Frenken, 2011; Cooke, 2012; Kroll & Stahlecker, 2015).”
• On the policy space of smart specialization strategies (2016, background): “And, indeed, this sort of policy has the potential to stimulate structural changes through various mechanisms such as diversification in firms, spin-offs and start-ups, mobility of people and networking (Boschma & Frenken, 2011).”
• Towards a comprehensive understanding of new regional industrial path development (2019, background): “They foreground the importance of a large number of local innovative firms in related industries, triggering dynamic branching processes (Boschma & Frenken, 2011), local inherited knowledge and skill bases (Martin, 2010), a strong endowment of regional supporting organizations (Isaksen & Trippl,…”