The ~Ir!Relevance of Militarized Interstate Disputes for International Trade

123 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Rules over Real Estate (2005, background): “Most obviously, a latent dispute could become active, involving trade sanctions or property destruction on a significant scale (Anderton and Carter 2001; Li and Sacko 2002; but see Barbieri and Levy 2001).”
War and the World Economy (2006, background): “Li and Sacko (2002) present a similar framework for their empirical inquiry into how different types of militarized interstate disputes (MIDs) affect bilateral trade.”
State Control and the Effects of Foreign Relations on Bilateral Trade (2019, background): “A large body of research has argued that interdependence encourages cooperative relations between states under commercial liberalism because governments respond to private economic interests (Polachek, 1980; Russett and Oneal, 2001; Li and Sacko, 2002; Gartzke, 2007; Lee and Mitchell, 2012).”
Trade does promote peace: New simultaneous estimates of the reciprocal effects of trade and conflict (2010, background): “Long (2008) and Li & Sacko (2002) find that conflict 11 The log likelihood in KR’s original conflict model is –1053.13.”
War, Peace, and the Invisible Hand: Positive Political Externalities of Economic Globalization (2003, background): “8 Li and Sacko (2002) show that, not only does conflict have an ex ante effect on trade (as Morrow suggests), but trade also has an ex post effect on conflict.”