Motor learning: its relevance to stroke recovery and neurorehabilitation.

By John W. Krakauer. Current Opinion in Neurology, 2006

1,286 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Robot-based hand motor therapy after stroke. (2007, methodology): “When comparing the two patient subgroups over time, a repeated measures ANOVA was performed to examine the time treatment group interaction, with time as the within-group variable and treatment group as the betweengroup variable.”
Principles of motor learning in treatment of motor speech disorders. (2008, background): “Krakauer, J. W. (2006). Motor learning: Its relevance to stroke”
Harnessing neuroplasticity for clinical applications (2011, neutral): “Krakauer (2006) noted that ‘recovery related to spontaneous biological processes seems to improve performance across a range of tasks whereas recovery mediated by training, like learning in healthy subjects, is more task-specific’.”
Rehabilitation of Motor Function after Stroke: A Multiple Systematic Review Focused on Techniques to Stimulate Upper Extremity Recovery (2016, positive): “Evidence suggests that neurological repair through brain reorganization supporting true recovery or, alternatively through compensation, may also take place in the subacute and chronic phase after stroke (Krakauer, 2006).”