Empirically-controlled mapping of the Caenorhabditis elegans protein-protein interactome network
By Nicolas Simonis, Jean‐François Rual, Anne-Ruxandra Carvunis, Murat Tasan, I. Lemmens, T. Hirozane-Kishikawa, Tong Hao, Julie M. Sahalie, K. Venkatesan, Fana Gebreab and 29 more. Nature Methods, 2009
305 citations recorded by the source corpus.
To provide accurate biological hypotheses and elucidate global properties of cellular networks, systematic identification of protein-protein interactions must meet high quality standards. We present an expanded C. elegans protein-protein interaction network, or 'interactome' map, derived from testing a matrix of ∼10,000 × ∼10,000 proteins using a highly specific, high-throughput yeast two-hybrid system. Through a new empirical quality control framework, we show that the resulting data set (Worm Interactome 2007, or WI-2007) was similar in quality to low-throughput data curated from the literature. We filtered previous interaction data sets and integrated them with WI-2007 to generate a high-confidence consolidated map (Worm Interactome version 8, or WI8). This work allowed us to estimate the size of the worm interactome at ∼116,000 interactions. Comparison with other types of functional genomic data shows the complementarity of distinct experimental approaches in predicting different functional relationships between genes or proteins.
Subfields: Aging, Molecular Biology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/18f7aa61039c2eedaeceb5980be640d23bb211ae
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Molecular Biology
Citations in the corpus
- Graphlet-based measures are suitable for biological network comparison (2013, background): “…of PPI networks, such as yeast two-hybrid (Y2H) screening (Arabidopsis Interactome Mapping Consortium, 2011; Ito et al., 2000; Rual et al., 2005; Simonis, 2009; Stelzl et al., 2005; Uetz et al., 2000) and mass spectrometry (MS) of purified complexes (Gavin et al., 2002, 2006; Krogan et al.,…”