Quantifying Spillover Effects from Large Land-based Investment: The Case of Mozambique
By K. Deininger, Fang Xia. 2016
140 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Almost a decade after a spike in land demand following the 2007–08 commodity boom, evidence on impacts of this phenomenon remains limited and mostly case study based. We show that information on location and start data of large farms, combined with existing smallholder farm surveys, allows to complement this with a difference-in-difference approach to systematically assess spillovers from large farm establishment. Illustrative application to Mozambique suggests positive short-term effects from newly established large farms on adoption of agricultural practices and input use by small farms less than 50km from newly established large operations. Robustness checks for crop farms only also suggest job creation in the proximity of newly established crop, but not livestock farms. Yet, large farm establishment decreased perceived well-being within a 25-km band and, in the time horizon considered here, did not lead to better access to output markets, cultivation of larger areas or, once other factors are controlled for, higher yields. This allows us to reject the notion of negative spillovers from large farm establishment but casts doubt on the wisdom of large unconditional subsidies to attract investors. In addition to drawing policy conclusions for Mozambique, we highlight the methodology’s wider applicability and scope for expansion.
Subfields: General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Pollution
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/18efeb983a9c536472500fd43f2a2c8900f6c485
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Citations in the corpus
- Trade-offs between environment and livelihoods: Bridging the global land use and food security discussions (2017, unknown): “Positive spillovers can arise from the coexistence of large-scale and smallholder farming (Deininger and Xia 2016) or their interactions such as through outgrowers schemes (Herrmann 2017), but large-scale investments often result in smallholders’ marginalization (Oberlack et al. 2016), leaving them…”
- Labour Market Effects of Large-Scale Agricultural Investment: Conceptual Considerations and Estimated Employment Effects (2017, background): “…in the context conditions have given reason to believe that large farms may have a future (Deininger & Byerlee, 2012) andmay actually contribute to increasedwelfare and poverty reduction due to employment creation (Deininger & Xia, 2016; Herrmann, 2017; Van den Broeck, Swinnen, & Maertens, 2017).”
- Are medium‐scale farms driving agricultural transformation in sub‐Saharan Africa? (2019, background): “Other studies in this emerging “spillovers” literature tend to find positive synergies in some cases and no clear statistical relationship in others (Ali, Deininger, & Harris, 2019; Lay, Nolte, & Sipangule, 2018; Deininger & Xia, 2016).”