Mineral dust aerosols in the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Sciences ModelE atmospheric general circulation model

227 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Atmospheric iron deposition: global distribution, variability, and human perturbations. (2009, background): “The literature contains reviews of dust models (e.g., Tegen 2003, Mahowald et al. 2005) and model intercomparisons (e.g., Textor et al. 2006), as well as syntheses of available data (Miller et al. 2006).”
CMIP5 historical simulations (1850–2012) with GISS ModelE2 (2014, background): “…as ‘‘p1’’ (physics-version 5 1) in the CMIP5 archive, the mass of radiatively active atmospheric constituents is prescribed, based upon separate calculations of their spatial extent and decadal variation since the preindustrial era [Shindell et al., 2003; Miller et al., 2006a; Koch et al., 2011].”
Configuration and assessment of the GISS ModelE2 contributions to the CMIP5 archive (2014, background): “Trenberth and Caron (2001) Zhang and Rossow (1997) Ganachaud and Wunsch (2003)”
Analysis and quantification of the diversities of aerosol life cycles within AeroCom (2005, unknown): “GOCART offline GEOS-DAS version 3 offline GEOS-DAS version 3 Balkanski et al. (1993); Giorgi and Chameides (1986) Balkanski et al. (1993); Giorgi and Chameides (1986) as liquid BC=0.6,POM: 0.6, SO 4 : 0.6, SS: 0.6 DU: 0.8 KYU (SPRINT) Le Treut and Li (1991) Arakawa and Schubert (1974) Takemura et al”