Rationality in decision- and policy-making: implications for strategic environmental assessment

By L. Kørnøv, W. Thissen. 2000

347 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Management Science and Operations Research, Public Administration

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/18e296a0407bdab445d5e4d42e39e201215cac40

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

1. Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas
2. Bo Elling
3. M. Partidário
4. R. Gomes

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. Abbas Mardani
2. Ahmad Jusoh
3. Norhayati Zakuan
4. Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas
5. Khalil Md Nor
6. Z. Khalifah
7. Bo Elling
8. M. Khoshnoudi

In Public Administration

1. Bo Elling

Citations in the corpus

• A review of multi-criteria decision-making applications to solve energy management problems: Two decades from 1995 to 2015 (2017, background): “In addition, SEA should directly act on the preparation and improvement procedure of policies, plans, and programs (PPP) to enhance the volume of effective decision primacies and develop the ecological and sustainability incorporation into the decision-making procedure [227].”
• Ecosystem services inclusive strategic environmental assessment (2013, background): “…in policy-making, planning and decision-making in constructive ways has been promoted by several authors as more appropriate to complex decision contexts (Bina, 2003; Eggenberger and Partidario, 1991; Kørnøv and Thissen, 2000; Nilsson and Dalkmann, 2001; Nitz and Brown, 2001; Nooteboom, 2006).”
• Rationality and effectiveness: does EIA/SEA treat them as synonyms? (2009, background): “Kørnøv and Thissen (2000) proposed a distinction between procedural and substantive rationality.”