R&D, Innovation, and Technological Progress: A Test of the Schumpeterian Framework without Scale Effects

By Marios Zachariadis. 2003

230 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/18cf61d38f2db505ff11f7c6fed63e5a143089d8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

Citations in the corpus

Accounting for Trends in Productivity and R&D: A Schumpeterian Critique of Semi‐Endogenous Growth Theory (2007, background): “∗We thank Chad Jones for his constructive criticisms.”
What is the Optimal Rate of R&D Investment to Maximize Productivity Growth? (2009, unknown): “Moreover, the null hypothesis that growth is not induced by R&D is rejected in favour of the Schumpeterian endogenous growth framework without scale effects [ 31 ].”
R&D, Innovation, and Economic Growth: An Empirical Analysis (2004, unknown): “Scherer (1982), Griliches and Lichtenberg (1984), Aghion and Howitt (1998), and Zachariadis (2003) provide strong evidence that in the U.S. economy R&D investment and TFP growth are positively related.”
CO2 Emissions, Research and Technology Transfer in China (2009, unknown): “Largely due to the lack of R&D data for developing countries, almost all previous work on R&D-based growth models has focused only on OECD countries (see, e.g., Zachariadis, 2003; Guellec and De la Potterie, 2004; Ha and Howitt, 2007).”
Can Second-Generation Endogenous Growth Models Explain the Productivity Trends and Knowledge Production in the Asian Miracle Economies? (2011, unknown): “I. Introduction R&D-BASED endogenous growth theories have beenincreasingly used to explain growth in the OECD industrialized countries (Coe & Helpman, 1995; Zachariadis, 2003, 2004; Kneller & Stevens, 2006; Ha & Howitt, 2007; Madsen, 2007, 2008a).”
Semi-endogenous versus Schumpeterian growth models: testing the knowledge production function using international data (2008, methodology): “The normalisation given by (7a) follows Zachariadis (2003, 2004) and Ha and Howitt (2007), and the normalization given by (7b) follows Ha and Howitt (2007).”
R&D‐induced Growth in the OECD? (2004, background): “The second finding, combined with the strong effect of aggregate R&D on industry-level patenting rates reported in Zachariadis (2003) for the United States, suggests the possibility of R&D spillovers.”
Scale effects in endogenous growth theory: an error of aggregation not specification (2006, background): “Previous studies have looked at the aggregate empirical implications of endogenous and semiendogenous growth models (e.g., Aghion & Howitt, 2005; Dinopoulos & Thompson, 1999; Ha & Howitt, 2006 Jones, 1995a,b; Zachariadis, 2003 ) but have not looked at the salient feature of models that distinguish ”