Essential properties of language, or, why language is not a code

By A. Kravchenko. 2007

135 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Cognitive Neuroscience, Cultural Studies

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/18ba0061cd29c94eae7b787d5f8f0a48b1291264

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

1. Stephen J. Cowley
2. J. MacSwan

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Stephen J. Cowley
2. J. MacSwan

In Cultural Studies

1. Stephen J. Cowley
2. J. MacSwan
3. Katharina J. Rohlfing
4. Iris Nomikou

Citations in the corpus

• A Multilingual Perspective on Translanguaging (2017, background): “However, some translanguaging scholars have recently called the existence of discrete languages into question, arguing that multilingualism(1) itself does not exist (compare Blommaert, 2010; Davidson, 1986; Harris, 1981; Heller, 2007; Heller & Duchêne, 2007; Kemp, 2009; Kravchenko, 2007; Makoni & Ma”
• Taking a Language Stance (2011, background): “Given that language has a bodily basis, such code views are increasingly challenged (e.g., Kravchenko, 2007; Love, 2004).”