Particle swarm optimization with deliberate loss of information
By C. Voglis, Konstantinos E. Parsopoulos, Isaac E. Lagaris. Soft Computing - A Fusion of Foundations, Methodologies and Applications, 2012
940 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Numerical Analysis
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/18ae6a40f5b54d146f588e1b84c7fe9fa4b7c1f2
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- L. Garamszegi
- H. Schielzeth
- N. Dochtermann
- Roger Mundry
- Shinichi Nakagawa
- Daniel Haun
- David Hodgson
- S. Jenkins
In Numerical Analysis
Citations in the corpus
- A brief introduction to mixed effects modelling and multi-model inference in ecology (2018, methodology): “NHST and stepwise deletion have come under heavy criticism; they can overestimate the effect size of ‘significant’ predictors (Whittingham et al 2006; Forstmeier & Schielzeth 2011) and force the researcher to focus on a single best model as if it were the only combination of predictors with support…”
- Mate competition, testosterone and intersexual relationships in bonobos, Pan paniscus (2012, methodology): “We based our inference on full models (and present their results) to avoid false positives as well as biased effect size estimates and P values (Forstmeier & Schielzeth 2011).”
- Fair Is Not Fair Everywhere (2015, methodology): “To test the significance of the test variables overall (Forstmeier & Schielzeth, 2011) and of interactions and factors with multiple levels, we compared models with and without the respective effect using likelihoodratio tests (Dobson, 2010).”
- Statistical Issues and Assumptions of Phylogenetic Generalized Least Squares (2014, methodology): “Then, the R2 of the respective model is calculated and this, in turn, is used to derive the VIF, as VIF = 1/(1-R2) (see Fox and Monette 1992 for how factors with more than two levels are treated in this context).”
- Quantifying individual variation in behaviour: mixed-effect modelling approaches. (2013, background): “…to encourage working towards the most significant description of the data set, because step-wise approaches are statistically problematic (e.g. Whittingham et al. 2006; Forstmeier & Schielzeth 2011; Simmons, Nelson & Simonsohn 2011), and inhibit general inferences (Dochtermann & Jenkins 2011).”
- Data reliability in citizen science: learning curve and the effects of training method, volunteer background and experience on identification accuracy of insects visiting ivy flowers (2016, background): “…for only those insect groups where the sample size (the number of participants who encountered at least one insect of that category) was equal to 3 9 the number of predictors (main effects and interactions) or greater (Forstmeier & Schielzeth 2011), that is ≥18 (Experiment 1) or ≥9 (Experiment 2).”
- Particle Swarm Methods (2018, neutral): “Moreover, the dynamic of the Canonical PSO model motivated recent approaches that spare function evaluations by taking advantage of the particles’ dynamic [148].”
- Developing multiple hypotheses in behavioral ecology (2010, background): “As discussed earlier, with exploratory analyses extending interpretations beyond the data set analyzed can lead to spurious inferences (Hurvich and Tsai 1990 ;Z hang1992; Chatfield 1995; see Forstmeier and Schielzeth 2010 , t his issue, for discussion of additional statistical concerns).”
- Information-theoretic approaches to statistical analysis in behavioural ecology: an introduction (2010, background): “More discussion on the full-model approach can be found in Forstmeier and Schielzeth (2010) .”
- Chimpanzees use long-term spatial memory to monitor large fruit trees and remember feeding experiences across seasons (2013, background): “We considered the effect of individual predictors only if the initial full model reached significance (Forstmeier & Schielzeth 2011).”
- Nested by design: model fitting and interpretation in a mixed model era (2013, background): “It is important to consider the potential for type I errors when testing a larger number of data-level predictors (Forstmeier & Schielzeth 2011).”