Bayesian ranking of biochemical system models
By Vladislav Vyshemirsky, Mark A. Girolami. 2008
222 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computational Theory and Mathematics, Molecular Biology
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computational Theory and Mathematics
- Chris J. Oates
- Darren J. Wilkinson
- Ben Calderhead
- Jan Peters
- M. P. Stumpf
- Tina Toni
- Youssef M. Marzouk
- Nikhil Galagali
In Molecular Biology
- Darren J. Wilkinson
- Chris J. Oates
- M. P. Stumpf
- Youssef M. Marzouk
- Nikhil Galagali
- Stefan Bauer
- Tina Toni
- Ben Calderhead
Citations in the corpus
- Control functionals for Monte Carlo integration (2014, methodology): “and Girolami, 2009). Recent empirical investigations recommend thermodynamic integration (TI) as one of the best-performing approaches to the estimation of normalising constants in complex 18 models (Vyshemirsky and Girolami, 2008; Friel and Wyse, 2012; Hug et al., 2015). The control variate methodo”
- Stochastic modelling for quantitative description of heterogeneous biological systems (2009, methodology): “All of the issues described here can be directly addressed using a Bayesian statistical approach using Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) technique”
- Automated adaptive inference of phenomenological dynamical models (2015, unknown): “…control methods are well established in statistical inference 26 and in choosing a systems biology model for data from a finite set of models 27–29 , we believe that they have not been used yet in the context of inferring complex, nonlinear dynamics from an infinite, complete set of all…”
- The Controlled Thermodynamic Integral for Bayesian Model Comparison (2014, methodology): “Recent empirical investigations, including Vyshemirsky and Girolami (2008); Friel and Wyse (2012), have revealed that TI is among the most promising approach to estimation of model evidence.”
- Riemann manifold Langevin and Hamiltonian Monte Carlo methods (2011, background): “An important class of problems recently gaining attention is the statistical analysis of uncertainty in dynamical systems defined by a system of non-linear differential equations (Ramsay et al., 2007; Calderhead and Girolami, 2009; Vyshemirsky and Girolami, 2008).”
- Estimating Bayes factors via thermodynamic integration and population MCMC (2009, methodology): “Firstly, it allows us to obtain samples from all the required thermodynamic distributions simultaneously, and secondly, the population structure enables sampling from the multimodal probability distributions that are induced by nonlinear ODEs.”
- Fast Gaussian Process Based Gradient Matching for Parameter Identification in Systems of Nonlinear ODEs (2018, background): “The second system to be analyzed is called Protein Transduction and was originally proposed in Vyshemirsky and Girolami (2008).”
- Simulation-based model selection for dynamical systems in systems and population biology (2009, methodology): “The present approach enables us to employ the whole formal apparatus to any system that can be (efficiently) simulated, even when exact likelihoods are computationally intractable.”
- The Controlled Thermodynamic Integral for Bayesian Model Evidence Evaluation (2016, background): “Recent empirical investigations, including Vyshemirsky and Girolami (2008) and Friel and Wyse (2012), have revealed that TI is among the most promising approach to estimation of model evidence.”
- Mechanistic Hierarchical Gaussian Processes (2014, background): “Parametric models based upon ODEs do exist but are known to be inadequate for characterizing muscle force tracings (Herzog 2004).”
- Identifying Causal Structure in Large-Scale Kinetic Systems (2018, methodology): “ity regularization with a model selection step based on the information criteria AIC and BIC. Common alternatives are based on approximate Bayesian computation or likelihood ratio [Toni et al., 2009, Vyshemirsky and Girolami, 2007]. Procedures using a Gaussian process prior on the solution of the di”
- Gradient Matching Methods for Computational Inference in Mechanistic Models for Systems Biology: A Review and Comparative Analysis (2015, background): “These equations model protein signaling transduction pathways in a signal transduction cascade, where the free parameters are kinetic parameters governing how quickly the proteins (“species”) convert to one another [Vyshemirsky and Girolami (2008)].”
- Comparing Families of Dynamic Causal Models (2010, methodology): “In a comparison of sample-based methods using synthetic data from biochemical networks, AIS provided the best balance between accuracy and computation time [13].”
- Towards Automatic Model Comparison: An Adaptive Sequential Monte Carlo Approach (2013, methodology): “The use of AIS for computing normalising constants directly and via path sampling dates back at least to Neal (2001); see Vyshemirsky and Girolami (2008) for a recent example of its use in the computation of model evidences.”
- Bayesian inference of chemical kinetic models from proposed reactions (2015, methodology): “Applications of these methods to chemical kinetics have been pursued in combustion modeling and systems biology when the number of competing models is small (Braman et al., 2013; Vyshemirsky and Girolami, 2008; Vyshemirsky et al., 2006; Willkinson, 2011; Xu et al., 2010; Zechner et al., 2014).”
- Input–output behavior of ErbB signaling pathways as revealed by a mass action model trained against dynamic data (2009, methodology): “and Markov chain Monte Carlo methods will be required (Vyshemirsky and Girolami, 2008).”