When should we use one‐tailed hypothesis testing?

201 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Review of alternative approaches to calculation of a confidence interval for the odds ratio of a 2 × 2 contingency table (2013, methodology): “…in our survey of the analysis of contingency tables in recent behavioural ecology studies, we found no use of any other measure except the OR (Ruxton & Neuhäuser 2010a), andOR is the onlymeasure discussed in commonly cited statistics texts aimed at biologists (e.g. Quinn&Keough 2002; Sokal…”
Reporting animal research: Explanation and elaboration for the ARRIVE guidelines 2.0 (2020, methodology): “The use of a one-sided test requires justification of why a treatment effect is only of interest when it is in a defined direction and why they would treat a large effect in the unexpected direction no differently from a nonsignificant difference [43].”
The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research* (2020, methodology): “The use of a one-sided test requires justification of why a treatment effect is only of interest when it is in a defined direction and why they would treat a large effect in the unexpected direction no differently from a nonsignificant difference [43].”