XMark: A Benchmark for XML Data Management

895 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Benchmarking cloud serving systems with YCSB (2010, background): “It is for similar reasons that new benchmarks have been developed for other non-traditional database systems (such as XMark for XML systems [28] and Linear Road for stream systems [14]).”
OLTP-Bench: An Extensible Testbed for Benchmarking Relational Databases (2013, background): “More recently, the emergence of new application domains has led to a proliferation of new benchmark specifications that target specific subfields, such as XML data stores [31], streaming data [7], key-value stores [16], table stores [24], hybrid OLAP/OLTP databases [18], dynamic websites [28], P2P s”
SP^2Bench: A SPARQL Performance Benchmark (2008, background): “, XMark [20]) have found broad acceptance, in particular in the research community.”
ORDPATHs: insert-friendly XML node labels (2004, positive): “For the XMark benchmark [7], which models an auction scenario, we used scale 0.”
An evaluation of alternative architectures for transaction processing in the cloud (2010, background): “, OO7 for object-oriented databases [6], Bucky for object-relational databases [7], XMark for XML databases [21], and Sequoia for scientific databases [25].”
MonetDB/XQuery: a fast XQuery processor powered by a relational engine (2006, methodology): “Figure 14 shows that XMark performance on the 110MB document is boosted by a factor 2 using these order optimizations.”