On stationary patterns of a reaction–diffusion model with autocatalysis and saturation law
By Rui Peng, Junping Shi, Mingxin Wang. 2008
145 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computer Networks and Communications, Mathematical Physics, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/185a3cfc746a291c28a93a12566b0698106918f9
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computer Networks and Communications
In Mathematical Physics
In Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Citations in the corpus
- Global bifurcation analysis and pattern formation in homogeneous diffusive predator–prey systems (2016, methodology): “We use the powerful Leray–Schauder degree theory to prove the existence of nonconstant steady states as in [24,25,33,34,45].”
- Existence and non-existence of spatial patterns in a ratio-dependent predator–prey model (2015, unknown): “…criteria for the stability of homogeneous steady-state and derivation of appropriate conditions for the existence and/or non-existence of non-constant stationary states (Pang and Wang, 2003; Peng and Shi, 2009; Peng et al., 2008; Shi, 2002; Shi et al., 2010; Smoller, 1994; Wang et al., 2011).”
- Bifurcation and spatiotemporal patterns in a homogeneous diffusive predator-prey system ✩ (2009, background): “2), we recall the following maximum principle (see [32,38]):”
- Non-existence of non-constant positive steady states of two Holling type-II predator–prey systems: Strong interaction case (2009, background): “1 of [32], it is noted that (w∗, z∗) is non-degenerate in the sense that zero is not the eigenvalue of such linearized problem (but not locally linearly stable since ±i√θ is a pair of conjugate imaginary eigenvalues of this linearized problem).”
- Dynamics and pattern formation in a diffusive predator–prey system with strong Allee effect in prey (2011, unknown): “9), we recall the following maximum principle [38]: Lemma 3.”