Methods matter: Testing competing models for designing short-scale Big-Five assessments

By G. Olaru, M. Witthöft, Oliver Wilhelm. 2015

112 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/18453514424a34ab9fdfef87e4c814b337695bc5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Simon Schindler
2. Johanna Hartung
3. C. Kandler
4. Mattis Geiger
5. S. Weiss
6. Stefan Pfattheicher

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Simon Schindler
2. Johanna Hartung
3. C. Kandler
4. Mattis Geiger
5. S. Weiss
6. Stefan Pfattheicher

Citations in the corpus

• Old Wine in New Bottles? The Case of Self–Compassion and Neuroticism (2017, methodology): “Relations to the five-factor model Owing to well-known problems in modelling the FFM (Kano & Harada, 2000; Olaru et al., 2015; Schulze & Roberts, 2006), we first optimized single-facet CFAs with the MML technique; that is, CFAs were conducted separately for each factor (see also Methods section).”