Development of a Cambridge Structural Database Subset: A Collection of Metal-Organic Frameworks for Past, Present, and Future

By Peyman Z. Moghadam, Aurelia Li, S. Wiggin, Andi Tao, A. Maloney, Peter A. Wood, Suzanna C. Ward, D. Fairen-jimenez. 2017

900 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Inorganic Chemistry, Materials Chemistry

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1844ad95767d7392a35ce692b94e880beb74c4b4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Inorganic Chemistry

1. David S. Sholl
2. Randall Q. Snurr
3. Maciej Haranczyk
4. Jeffrey S. Camp
5. Benjamin J. Bucior
6. Yongchul G. Chung
7. Seda Keskin
8. O. Farha

In Materials Chemistry

1. David S. Sholl
2. Maciej Haranczyk
3. Randall Q. Snurr
4. B. Slater
5. Alfred D. French
6. O. Farha
7. J. Hupp

Citations in the corpus

• Advances, Updates, and Analytics for the Computation-Ready, Experimental Metal–Organic Framework Database: CoRE MOF 2019 (2019, methodology): “This leaves us with 16 synthesized hMOFs.”
• Mercury 4.0: from visualization to analysis, design and prediction (2020, methodology): “A more complex example was published by Moghadam et al. (2017), who wrote a Python script to take any metal–organic framework (MOF) structure in Mercury and automatically remove both unbound and bound solvent molecules for easier analysis or subsequent calculations (Fig.”