Slip‐weakening behavior during the propagation of dynamic ruptures obeying rate‐ and state‐dependent friction laws
By A. Bizzarri, Massimo Cocco. 2003
136 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Geophysics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/180f5d36d2387250431a6007ac09252898857225
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Geophysics
Citations in the corpus
- The finite-difference and finite-element modeling of seismic wave propagation and earthquake motion (2007, background): “Cocco and Bizzarri (2002) and Bizzarri and Cocco (2003, 2005) compared the two friction laws in detail.”
- Constitutive relationships and physical basis of fault strength due to flash heating (2008, background): “Better estimates require fully elastodynamic simulations [e.g., Bizzarri and Cocco, 2003].”
- A Kinematic Source Time Function Compatible With Earthquake Dynamics: Relations Between Kinematic and Dynamic Parameters (2004, background): “This is physically reasonable because it is widely believed that different mechanisms control slip acceleration and the healing of slip (see Bizzarri and Cocco, 2003; Cocco et al., 2004, and references therein).”
- Statistical physics of fracture, friction, and earthquakes (2011, background): “Dc is on the same order of (or at most several tens of) the characteristic length L in an evolution law (Bizzarri and Cocco, 2003).”
- Earthquake nucleation on (aging) rate and state faults (2005, unknown): “For W = 1 this reduces to the result of Bizzarri and Cocco [2003] that the effective slip-weakening distance is larger than Dc by the logarithm of the ratio of qi to the steady state q at seismic slip speeds (see also Dieterich and Kilgore [1996]).”
- A thermal pressurization model for the spontaneous dynamic rupture propagation on a three‐dimensional fault: 1. Methodological approach (2006, methodology): “The adopted parameters are listed in Table 1; we emphasize that we have chosen a characteristic length scale parameter L for RS that is one order of magnitude smaller than d0 in SW: this agrees with the scaling between the equivalent SW distance d0 eq and L proposed by Cocco and Bizzarri [2002] and ”
- Inferring earthquake physics and chemistry using an integrated field and laboratory approach (2012, background): “…al., 2004; Yoshida and Kato, 2003; Liu and Rice, 2005; Rubin, 2008) and dynamic slip (e.g. Rice and Tse, 1986; Dieterich, 1992; Fukuyama and Madariaga, 1998; Bizzarri and Cocco, 2003) and the temporal distribution of aftershocks (e.g. Dieterich, 1994; Harris and Simpson, 1998; Ziv and Rubin, 2003).”