Low-level components of analytic activity in information visualization
By R. Amar, James R. Eagan, John T. Stasko. IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization, 2005. INFOVIS 2005., 2005
864 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/180e548520d2091beb8bb039473bd542e7de5aec
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Tamara Munzner
- Jeffrey Heer
- Niklas Elmqvist
- Pierre Dragicevic
- Jean-Daniel Fekete
- Bum Chul Kwon
- Sukwon Lee
- Sung-Hee Kim
In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Tamara Munzner
- Niklas Elmqvist
- Jean-Daniel Fekete
- Jeffrey Heer
- Pierre Dragicevic
- Bum Chul Kwon
- Michael Sedlmair
- Geoffrey P. Ellis
In Sociology and Political Science
- Tamara Munzner
- Michael Sedlmair
- Jean-Daniel Fekete
- Bum Chul Kwon
- Jeffrey Heer
- Miriah D. Meyer
- Sukwon Lee
- Sung-Hee Kim
Citations in the corpus
- Fluid interaction for information visualization (2011, neutral): “For example, although Amar et al.(13) present a meta-level review of typical analysis tasks and Yi et al.”
- Rolling the Dice: Multidimensional Visual Exploration using Scatterplot Matrix Navigation (2008, background): “These are compound tasks that consist of several smaller subtasks [2].”
- VLAT: Development of a Visualization Literacy Assessment Test (2017, methodology): “The topic of visualization literacy is gaining recognition within the Information Visualization community, and a number of researchers have begun to explore this topic [8] [10] [33].”
- Design Study Methodology: Reflections from the Trenches and the Stacks (2012, background): “Although similarly crisp low-level visualization tasks exist, such as correlate, cluster or find outliers [2], reducing a real-world problem to these tasks is challenging and time consuming.”
- Visual Analytics: Definition, Process, and Challenges (2008, neutral): “regarding the main data types and user tasks [2] to be supported are highly desirable for shaping visual analytics research.”
- Mastering the Information Age - Solving Problems with Visual Analytics (2010, background): “user tasks[4] to be supported are highly desirable for shaping visual analytics research.”
- Formalizing Visualization Design Knowledge as Constraints: Actionable and Extensible Models in Draco (2018, methodology): “If activity-oriented [40] or low-level [2] task taxonomies were expressed as constraints, they could be used in automated design systems.”
- Natural Language to Code Generation in Interactive Data Science Notebooks (2022, methodology): “In addition, other works have also considered applications such as synthesizing visualization plots (Amar et al., 2005; Wang et al., 2019; Narechania et al., 2020; Fu et al., 2020; Wu et al., 2022b).”
- A Nested Model for Visualization Design and Validation (2009, background): “It has been used at multiple levels of abstraction and granularity: • high-level domain: cure disease, provide a good user experience during web search; • lower-level domain: investigate microarray data showing gene expression levels and the network of gene interactions [6], analyze web session logs”
- Characterizing Users' Visual Analytic Activity for Insight Provenance (2008, methodology): “In contrast, user-oriented taxonomies typically characterize high-level human cognitive tasks or visual perceptual behaviors (e.g., [ 1 , 2, 9, 23]).”
- Toward a Deeper Understanding of the Role of Interaction in Information Visualization (2007, background): “…generalize, identify, locate, rank, reveal, switch) and direct visual organizing and encoding tasks (encode) Amar, Eagan, and Stasko (2005) [4] Retrieve value, filter, compute derived value, find extremum, sort, determine range, characterize distribution, find anomalies, cluster, and…”